ABSTRACT
The perceived risk of transmission of aerosolised viral particles from patients to airway practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic led to the widespread use of aerosol precautions, including personal protective equipment and modifications to anaesthetic technique. The risk of these aerosol precautions on peri-operative airway complications has not been assessed outside of simulation studies. This prospective, national, multicentre cohort study aimed to quantify this risk. Adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia for elective or emergency procedures over a 96-hour period were included. Data collected included use of aerosol precautions by the airway practitioner, airway complications and potential confounding variables. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to assess the risk of individual aerosol precautions on overall and specific airway complications. Data from 5905 patients from 70 hospital sites were included. The rate of airway complications was 10.0% (95%CI 9.2-10.8%). Use of filtering facepiece class 2 or class 3 respirators was associated with an increased risk of airway complications (odds ratio 1.38, 95%CI 1.04-1.83), predominantly due to an association with difficult facemask ventilation (odds ratio 1.68, 95%CI 1.09-2.61) and desaturation on pulse oximetry (odds ratio 2.39, 95%CI 1.26-4.54). Use of goggles, powered air-purifying respirators, long-sleeved gowns, double gloves and videolaryngoscopy were not associated with any alteration in the risk of airway complications. Overall, the use of filtering facepiece class 2 or class 3 respirators was associated with an increased risk of airway complications, but most aerosol precautions used during the COVID-19 pandemic were not.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Cohort Studies , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Introduction The Sars-CoV-2 pandemic led to a national lockdown in Ireland from March 12th to June 7th, 2020. The present study aimed to assess the change in the pattern of cycling attendances to an Irish ED during a pandemic. Methods This is a retrospective before-and-after study carried out at a university hospital ED. We compared cycling attendances during Lockdown (LD) (13th March-7th June 2020) with Pre-Lockdown (PLD) (January 1st-March 12th, 2020). Furthermore, we also compared lockdown to an historical control period during the equivalent dates in 2019 (i.e. March 13th-June 7th, 2019) Results There were 151 cycling attendances during LD, 122 in PLD and 164 during the control period. The number of cyclists presenting during "rush hour traffic" in the LD period was 30 (19.9%) versus 42 (34.4%) during PLD (p<0.05) and 51 (31.1%) during the control period (p<0.05). During LD, 8 (5.3%) collisions involved a motor vehicle compared to 26 (21.3%) in PLD (p<0.05) and 43 (26.2%) during the control period (p<0.05). Conclusion Lockdown did not result in increased cycling attendances to this ED. The patients who did sustain a cycling-related injury during lockdown were less likely to have collided with a motor vehicle compared to the control period. The reduction in motor vehicle collisions could be attributed to less traffic congestion and highlights the potential benefits of road-user segregation.
ABSTRACT
Aim Deaths of doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic prompted an assessment of financial resilience among doctors in training in Ireland Methods In 2020, a 27-item online survey of demographics, work practices and finances was circulated nationally. The results were assessed using multiple correspondence analysis to develop a financial resilience framework. Results 161 responses were received. Only 26 (16.1%) respondents had income insurance, 10 (6.2%) had composed a will, and 41 (25.5%) had life insurance. 135 (83.9%) had not sought financial guidance and 153 (95%) were not aware of employer supports in event of death/disability. 105 (65.2%) would be considered financially fragile based on their median savings. Using a multiple correspondence analysis, 74 (46%) of the cohort were financially insecure. In the event of death 44/70 (62.9%) of those with dependents, felt that their dependents would not be looked after. Conclusion The majority of doctors in training lack both financial resilience and knowledge, nor are they aware of financial support structures. Financial management should be incorporated into medical education.